How I Fixed 50 TypeScript Errors in 10 Minutes
A real-world walkthrough of AI-powered error fixing that would have taken hours manually.
The Situation
It was Friday afternoon. I'd just upgraded our project from TypeScript 4.9 to 5.3. The terminal exploded with 50 type errors across 23 files. The old me would have sighed, grabbed more coffee, and settled in for a long evening. But I had Claude Code.
$ tsc --noEmit
Found 50 errors in 23 files.
src/services/UserService.ts(34,5): error TS2345...
src/utils/validation.ts(12,20): error TS2322...
src/components/DataTable.tsx(89,12): error TS2739...
... 47 more errors
The Traditional Approach
Normally, I'd click through each error, understand the context, research the TypeScript change that caused it, and manually fix each one. For 50 errors, that's easily 2-3 hours of tedious work. And that's if none of the fixes cascade into new errors.
The Claude Code Approach
Step 1: Set the Context (30 seconds)
"I just upgraded TypeScript from 4.9 to 5.3. Run tsc and fix all the type errors. Maintain the existing code patterns and don't change any actual functionality."
Step 2: Let Claude Work (5 minutes)
Claude immediately ran `tsc --noEmit` to see all the errors, then started methodically working through them. It understood the patterns in our codebase and fixed each error consistently.
The errors fell into categories:
- Type narrowing changes: 15 errors
- Stricter generic constraints: 12 errors
- Updated module resolution: 8 errors
- Deprecated API usage: 10 errors
- Null safety improvements: 5 errors
Step 3: Review the Fixes (4 minutes)
I scanned through the changes. Each fix was clean, minimal, and followed our existing patterns. A few examples:
// Before: Type narrowing issue
if (user) {
return user.name; // Error: 'user' could be undefined
}
// After: Proper type guard
if (user !== undefined && user !== null) {
return user.name; // OK
}
Step 4: Run Tests (30 seconds)
"Run the test suite to make sure nothing broke"
$ npm test
All 234 tests passed.
Why This Worked So Well
Pattern Recognition
Claude understood that similar errors should be fixed the same way across files. Consistency that would be hard to maintain manually.
Full Codebase Context
Claude read the surrounding code and understood our conventions. Fixes matched our style, not generic solutions.
TypeScript Knowledge
Claude knew exactly what changed between TS versions and applied the correct fix for each error type.
No Copy-Paste Errors
Every fix was fresh. No accidentally carrying over mistakes from one file to another.
The Results
10 min
Total time
50
Errors fixed
23
Files modified
100%
Tests passing
Key Takeaways
- Be specific about what not to change: Saying "don't change functionality" prevented over-eager refactoring.
- Let AI categorize the errors: It naturally grouped similar issues and fixed them consistently.
- Trust but verify: The review step caught one edge case that needed manual adjustment.
- Run tests: Always verify with your test suite before committing.
That Friday evening? I went home on time.
Turn Hours Into Minutes
Get Bridge Terminal and handle tedious tasks from anywhere, even your commute.
Download Bridge Terminal FreeBridge Terminal Team
AI Development Tools